by Sam Pierce
I occasionally visit the vile Huffington Post because I believe it is important to know what the enemies of liberty and responsibility are advocating. It was also the original inspiration for this blog, as one might have surmised in reading the title Malignant Liberal Idiocy. Today’s visit provided the usual sense of anger and disbelief as I skimmed the summaries of the sewage posted within the on-line septic tank. One piece in particular caught my eye because noted HuffPo abortion advocate, Cristina Page, was once again attempting to diminish the actions and motives of decent people (or as she calls them: “so-called anti-abortion movement”) because some of them disagree with her taxpayer funded birth control bonanza (”hand-out” doesn’t seem to be anatomically correct here.)
Cristina Page: “Pro-Life” Movement Admits Pro-Abortion Stance.
Sometimes referred to as “The Pro-life Paradox,” researchers and women’s health advocates in recent years have drawn attention to the disparities between the mission statements of so-called “anti-abortion” groups and the effects of their policies. For example, the countries considered the most “pro-choice,” where contraception is widely available and abortion is legal, and often free of charge, are those that also have the lowest abortion rates in the world. The countries with the highest rates of abortion are those that have adopted the policies of the so-called “anti-abortion” movement and have banned abortion and opposed efforts to make contraception more widely available.
Ever notice how phrases like “women’s health advocates” are used in the place of more accurate descriptions such as ‘baby killing advocates’ or ‘preventing health of future women advocates’?
Apparently “pro-life” leaders are actually pro-abortion because they don’t approve of the use of taxpayer funds to distribute “free” condoms and birth control pills. It is apparently a pro-abortion stance to believe in personal responsibility. I suppose it is religious zealotry to believe that a person should be responsible for his or her choices. It is a good thing that the world has entities such as The Huffington Post, NARAL, and other crusaders against morality to alert the populace to the devious actions that can be associated with anything moral so they can know what must be disregarded as religious fanaticism.
The advocates for prevention of future women (and their health) would have us believe that birth control is not “widely available” unless the government provides it! This notion is incredibly idiotic and it indicates the actual goal of these people. In the spirit of President Barack “Born Alive, Let Them Die” Obama’s affinity for wealth redistribution, these “pro-choice” groups seek redistribution of resources from the responsible to the irresponsible with the government as the conduit. Of course they seek redistribution in the form of rubbers, pills, and abortions… oh and education dollars to promote the use of rubbers, pills, and abortions… oh and education dollars to teach people how to acquire rubbers, pills, and abortions at the expense of others.
Responsibility should not be limited to taking money from the productive to distribute to the unproductive, which is the only responsibility the libiots can stomach. Personal responsibility should not be discouraged and this is what our government does when it takes from those that work to buy birth control for those that don’t. Mrs. Page might conveniently ignore the fact that no unintended pregnancy, with the exception of rape, ever resulted without engaging in sexual intercourse, but it is disingenuous to do so. It would be a start if people like Mrs. Page would at least admit their goals. Admitting you have a problem is a good first step.
Cross-posted from: Malignant Liberal Idiocy
