Bloomberg News ran a story today that says 100 investors who donated to President Obama in 2008 have flipped this year to making donations to Mitt Romney instead. And this is supposed to reassure us about Romney in what way exactly? The same Investors who were too obtuse to realize they were backing a crypto-socialist in 2008, now want Mr. Romney to replace him? This is good news perhaps for Romney's campaign treasurer. But is this a good omen for the ecumenical appeal of the Romney campaign, or is it a very bad omen for the kind of president he would be if he were nominated and elected?
The Review
- All posts, comments and
statements made on IR are those of the authors only. Any disputes must be addressed to the writers, who are solely responsible for their posts, comments and statements. We reserve the right to deny or remove comments. Content may not be used without permission of the author.
Subscribe
Follow IR
« 911 tapes shed light on domestic squabbles involving Sen. Suzi Schmidt | Main | State Rep. Morrison Stands with Faith Based Adoption Agencies »
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Comments
Contact IR
Categories
- Abortion
- ACORN/SEIU
- Brinkman's Reviews
- Campaign 2012
- Campaign 2014
- Campaign 2016
- Campaign 2018
- Campaign 2020
- COVID-19
- Di Leo columns
- Durbin
- Economy
- Education
- Energy & Environment
- Family & Marriage
- For the Good of Illinois PAC
- Foreign Policy
- Free Markets
- Government Reform
- Health Care
- Hesham Shehab Columns
- HPV Vaccination
- Illinois Hall of Fame
- Illinois politics
- Immigration
- Interviews
- IR 2014 Candidate Survey bios
- IR Reviews
- Jobs & Labor
- Legal Issues & Courts
- Masters of Manufacturing
- Media
- Religion
- Second Amendment
- Taxes
- War on Terrorism