If you saw your dog and a stranger both drowning in the ocean, which would you save first? Your answer says, well, everything about how you see the world.
Consider rich New Yorkers or Englishmen, who will feed their cats and dogs caviar, while a starving child languishes just outside the door.
Ever read Charles Dickens’ views of 19th century London?
How incredibly simplistic! And wrong. Conservatives are far too selective in the people they would save. Show an African-American male teenager and a dog, and their “judeo-Christian” values would go down the toilet. Hypocrisy is a hallmark of conservatism.
Good timing on this since Ringling Brothers and Barnum and Bailey just went out of business.
I think it depends on which human. I wouldn’t universally say humans are more valuable than animals.
Consider rich New Yorkers or Englishmen, who will feed their cats and dogs caviar, while a starving child languishes just outside the door.
Ever read Charles Dickens’ views of 19th century London?
How incredibly simplistic! And wrong. Conservatives are far too selective in the people they would save. Show an African-American male teenager and a dog, and their “judeo-Christian” values would go down the toilet. Hypocrisy is a hallmark of conservatism.