If you saw your dog and a stranger both drowning in the ocean, which would you save first? Your answer says, well, everything about how you see the world.
47.7
F
Chicago
Thursday, March 23, 2023
IR Media Corp.
Mark A. Vargas, Editor-in-Chief
Scott R. Kaspar, Publisher
Company
All posts, comments and statements made on IR are those of the authors only. Any disputes must be addressed to the writers, who are solely responsible for their posts, comments and statements. We reserve the right to deny or remove comments. Content may not be used without permission of the author.
Sitemap
© 2023 IR Media Corp., all rights reserved. ILLINOIS REVIEW and the IR design are trademarks of IR Media Corp.
Good timing on this since Ringling Brothers and Barnum and Bailey just went out of business.
I think it depends on which human. I wouldn’t universally say humans are more valuable than animals.
Consider rich New Yorkers or Englishmen, who will feed their cats and dogs caviar, while a starving child languishes just outside the door.
Ever read Charles Dickens’ views of 19th century London?
How incredibly simplistic! And wrong. Conservatives are far too selective in the people they would save. Show an African-American male teenager and a dog, and their “judeo-Christian” values would go down the toilet. Hypocrisy is a hallmark of conservatism.