57.3
F
Chicago
Sunday, May 28, 2023
IR Media Corp.
Mark A. Vargas, Editor-in-Chief
Scott R. Kaspar, Publisher
Company
All posts, comments and statements made on IR are those of the authors only. Any disputes must be addressed to the writers, who are solely responsible for their posts, comments and statements. We reserve the right to deny or remove comments. Content may not be used without permission of the author.
Sitemap
© 2023 IR Media Corp., all rights reserved. ILLINOIS REVIEW and the IR design are trademarks of IR Media Corp.
Why? Wouldn’t it be better to leave Rahm Emmanuel twisting in the wind from the noose he placed around his own neck?
I would love to see the guy gone too, but let’s leave the symbolism to the Rev. Jesse Jackson and be practical here.
So far there are two House Republicans on board … more to come? And what of the Senate R’s? Shouldn’t they seize the opportunity to file the same bill in the Senate? #WellWereWaiting
The question is would Rauner, Rahm’s fine wine and investing buddy, sign the legislation?
I agree completely.
Rahm has another losing battle looming with Karen Lewis.
I say get the popcorn ready, sit back, and watch Rahm the Clintonista/Obama buddy wallow in the mess he has created.
Besides, if Emmanuel is gone, who will be there to protect “Chicago values”?
Will the Republicans bother to run anybody for Cook County States Attorney? THAT should be an opportunity.
There is a Republican candidate for states attorney on the ballot