16.1 F
Friday, January 27, 2023
HomeIllinois PoliticsWill Mark Kirk once again be the only Republican to support sanctuary...

Will Mark Kirk once again be the only Republican to support sanctuary cities?



Stop Sanctuary Cities Latino

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Senate will be voting on an immigration measure called "Kate's Law" in memory of Kate Steinle's death a year ago allegedly at the hands of an immigrant that had been deported six times.

Illinois' U.S. Senator Mark Kirk was the only Republican to join the Democrats in opposing an effort to requiring states and localities to enforce federal immigration law once before.Will Mark Kirk once again be the only Republican to support sanctuary cities?

Wednesday, the Federation for American Immigration Reform issued a call for Illinoisans to contact Senators Kirk and Durbin before the vote.

Friday marked the one year anniversary of Kate Steinle's murder in San Francisco by an illegal alien with seven convictions and five previous deportations. Kate's death was a direct consequence of San Francisco's status as a sanctuary city — state and local jurisdictions with policies that impede the enforcement of federal immigration law. These lawless policies, enacted in over 300 jurisdictions nationwide, needlessly endanger American lives and all too often result in preventable tragedies.

Despite the public outrage over Kate's murder, Senate Democrats denied justice for the Steinle family when they voted against a bill that would eliminate sanctuary jurisdictions. Last October, Sen. David Vitter's (R-LA) "Stop Sanctuary Policies and Protect Americans Act" (S. 2146) failed 54-45 (with 60 "yes" votes needed). All Senate Democrats except Sens. Joe Donnelly (D-IN) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) placed partisan politics over sound policy and voted to kill the bill. Pro-amnesty Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) was the only Republican to vote against the bill, while Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) did not cast a vote.

Now, more than a year after Kate's tragic and entirely preventable death, the Senate will finally vote again on anti-sanctuary city legislation. Introduced by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA), the "Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act" (S. 3100) is a commonsense bill that denies certain federal grants to sanctuary jurisdictions and clarifies that state and local authorities are permitted by law to carry out detainer requests. Additionally, the Senate will vote on Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-TX) "Kate's Law" (S. 2193), which establishes a mandatory minimum five year prison sentence for illegal reentry.

Today's votes are incredibly important and the choices are clear: YES votes on S. 3100 and S. 2193 demonstrate that your Senator values protecting the safety of law-abiding American citizens; a NO vote on either measure shows that they are in favor of protecting criminal aliens — individuals who not only violate our immigration laws, but our criminal laws as well.

Call your Senators and tell them:

  • You OPPOSE sanctuary cities which ignore federal immigration laws and jeopardize American lives
  • You expect them to VOTE FOR the "Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act" (S. 3100) and "Kate's Law" (S. 2193)
  • You expect them to PRESSURE President Obama into signing these bills into law

Make your voice heard! To find your Senators, click here.

After you call your Senators, please make these same points on their social media accounts.


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories


  1. Senator Kirk, do not support sanctuary cities. Illegal aliens cost us taxpayers 3 billion dollars a year, we can’t afford to subsidize criminals. The state of Illinois has had an unbalanced budget for many years and has a 150+ BILLION dollar state debt.
    The lie that illegal aliens don’t hurt nothing is just that, a lie!

  2. Yes, but only slightly worse than Ryan, Boehner, McConnell et. al.
    I take that back, he is actually not as bad as the aforementioned supposed Republicans actually have power and used it to much the same effect on the most critical issues facing the nation.

  3. Some conservative organizations are asking us to “contact Senators Kirk and Durbin to vote NO on sanctuary cities.”
    Don’t waste your time. You KNOW how these two liberals will vote, and it won’t be to halt it.

  4. That bill is about whether Congress should withhold federal funds from sanctuary cities. Congress never should have considered giving money to any city or state government. That spending violates the 10th Amendment.