28.8 F
Friday, January 27, 2023
HomeIllinois NewsState lawmakers and officials respond to Supreme Court's Janus decision

State lawmakers and officials respond to Supreme Court’s Janus decision




SPRINGFIELD – Several Illinois lawmakers are expressing their thoughts about the US Supreme Court decision Wednesday that effectively set up "right to work" policies for state employees nationwide.

State Rep. Allen Skillicorn (R-East Dundee) said: "Let me be crystal clear, this is about political special interests, not labor. Workers who wish to remain members of their union are unaffected by the ruling. This is a major victory for worker rights and democracy." 

Skillicorn went on to call for two bills he's introduced to move forward: HB673 and HB4419, which allow employees to organize, negotiate, or bargain collectively with their employers through representatives of their own free choice, and protecting them should they choose not to.

"Union members should have a choice, everyone should have a choice. It’s the right thing to do," he said in a statement.

State Comptroller Susana Mendoza (D-Chicago) is very disappointed … 

Screen Shot 2018-06-27 at 10.34.42 AM

And so are her Democrats counterparts in the Illinois Senate:

Illinois Senate President John J. Cullerton released a statement expressing his disappointment in the decision.

“The ability to collectively bargain provides economic power and protections that for decades strengthened working families across this country.

"I am disappointed that the U.S. Supreme Court sided with anti-union corporate interests who seek to redefine the very meaning of the word ‘collective’ for no reason other than to enrich their own bottom line at the expense of workers.

"I remain a believer in the role of organized labor and collective bargaining to make our workplaces and communities strong. Unions were born of challenges and sacrifice. I have faith that they will weather this challenge, too.

"But that belief doesn’t change the fact that this is a fundamentally disappointing decision and harbinger of where this anti-worker political agenda will go if we don’t protect the economic rights of working men and women.”

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the landmark Illinois public employee union case Janus v. AFSCME Council 31 overturns unions’ ability to collect fees from non-members to cover the costs of collective bargaining and enforcement of labor contracts. These fees are known as “fair-share” or “agency fee” payments.

Bruce Rauner filed suit over fair-share fees in 2015 shortly after becoming governor. The Supreme Court’s ruling, which overturns a 1977 decision, has implications for collective bargaining units all over the country.

Assistant Majority Leader Kimberly A. Lightford (D-Maywood) released the following statement:

“The SCOTUS today just dismantled the fundamental concept of a contract. In siding with Mark Janus, the court sets up a classist system where union workers must pay the bill for workers to receive the hard-fought wages, benefits and job protection rights that come from collective bargaining.

This decision is, without a doubt, a substantial attack on organized labor and the equality and fairness that generations of union activists have shepherded. Make no mistake, this is an example of just how much harm one greedy, ideological decision of “activist judges” can inflict on millions of Americans – especially hard-working people of color.

Organized labor thrives when the wealthiest and greediest among us have the arrogance to systematically limit the opportunities for the majority of us. And I’ll stand anywhere I can to help organize with teachers, laborers, social service workers, moms, dads, neighbors and friends who are ready to fight for economic dignity.”

State Senator Andy Manar said he is disappointed the U.S. Supreme Court moved today to weaken organized labor and collective bargaining rights for American workers.

“As if the middle class doesn’t have enough problems already, the Supreme Court today chose to put wealthy corporate interests ahead of working people in Illinois and across the country,” said Manar, a Bunker Hill Democrat whose district includes a large number of unionized state employees, as well as many trade union members.

“This case was never about freedom of speech. Its aim from the start was to stifle the voices of teachers, first responders and other frontline workers across the country,” Manar said.

“Make no mistake: the corporations and far-right dark-money organizations behind this case that desperately want more control over government to advance their own interests benefit the most from weakening collective bargaining and diminishing the voice of union labor.”

State Senator Dave Koehler expressed concern with the U.S. Supreme Court decision to erode collective bargaining rights for workers who depend on unions to amplify their voice in the workplace.

“Unions use collective bargains to improve wages, working conditions and benefits for workers across the board. This decision allows some to not have to pay for that representation but still get to enjoy the benefits. That is just plain unfair,” Koehler (D-Peoria) said.

He noted that 2018 marks 50 years since Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in Memphis while there to support sanitation workers in their fight for collective bargaining rights.

“Although Gov. Rauner has no regrets about what he’s done by pursuing an end to fair-share fees, I fear today’s Supreme Court decision will have far-reaching economic consequences for America’s already shrinking middle class,” Koehler said.

State Senator Bill Cunningham expressed disappointment in this morning’s U.S. Supreme Court decision.

“This is the result of Gov. Bruce Rauner’s obsessive attacks on teachers, police officers, firefighters and all the other public employees who do difficult work on behalf of taxpayers every day,” said Cunningham, a Democrat representing Chicago and the southwest suburbs.

“The middle class is shrinking in our nation, and it is in large part due to the loss of union jobs. Those losses will accelerate with the Janus decision. It’s both shameful and telling that the governor will count this set-back for working families as one of the few ‘accomplishments’ of his tenure.”

State Senator Toi Hutchinson (D-Chicago Heights) released the following statement this morning:

“Today’s court decision will have a direct impact on the income, health benefits and overall standard of living for thousands of public workers and their families across our nation. These are workers who care for our children, protect our environment and keep us safe.

“At a time of historic inequity in our economy, this is the latest blow to working families that will have a ripple effect for decades to come. It also shows us that partisan gamesmanship in Washington is continuing to enrich special interests at the expense of working families.”

More to come …


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories


  1. Manar and these morons are wrong… it is about freedom, the dems are all about the right to choose to murder an unborn baby, but thinks a worker shouldn’t have the right to decide to pay union dues. There is nothing more dictatorial than union leadership

  2. Those Democrats can see the money extorted from unwilling union members, then handed to the Democrats by the union bosses, draining out of their campaign piggy banks.
    No wonder they’re crying. HA! HA! HA! HA!

  3. What this decision is about is reducing the wages of public employees in IL. Unions have been very effective through collective bargaining in increasing the wages and benefits of their members over the years. Some would argue those wages are, in economic terms, above-equilibrium wages.
    So this decision strikes at the fees that the unions collect for this service which involves representation, negotiation as well as political lobbying. It basically says that the union can not collect what it is due in agency fees for the service it provides from those who are non-members. It is sort of like a restaurant being forced to provide food for all who enter the building yet the recipients of the food can decide whether they pay or not. Complete asininity. How is this conservative?
    I don’t think there will be this mass exodus of union members precisely because unions have been so effective and the vast majority of union members know this and appreciate their unions. It may rein in certain costs at each union as all expenditures will be watched more closely.
    But for any members who do opt out, this creates a free-rider issue and free association problem for others. The opt-outers create a negative externality of other people. How nice. They will be benefiting for free. And the unions must continue to associate with people it has no desire to do so.
    Many conservatives are so blinded by anti-middle class laissez-faire ideology today that they are unable to see the harm and unfairness in this. And, in my many conversations with many of them, I have yet to find someone who can effectively counter any of these arguments, let alone understand the basics of the micro economic and macro economic concepts that they hold so dear.

  4. We found this interesting fact on the Governing website:
    In the five years following the Great Recession, all but 10 states reduced pension benefits for workers. Among those that didn’t, seven were right-to-work states with supposedly weaker unions. In addition, 36 states increased the amount employees are required to contribute toward their pensions. Of the 14 that didn’t, half were right-to-work states.

  5. Big A, you should watch the movie “Armed and Dangerous” with John Candy, Eugene Levy, Meg Ryan, and Robert Loggia (plays the bad guy, but would be the hero to you). It is slyly presented as a silly comedy But I like to think of it as more of a union documedy.
    As for public sector unions, they are grotesque. They organize against the taxpayers who are forced to pay the salaries and benefits to so many slovenly leeches.