WASHINGTON DC – The Washington Times reports the Supreme Court decided a Colorado baker's First Amendment right that says
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof: or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances
The Supreme Court held Monday a Christian baker’s religious liberty was violated when Colorado’s Civil Rights Commission penalized him for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.
The 7 to 2 ruling found the Colorado Civil Rights Commission did not view the baker’s case with “religious neutrality.”
Technically speaking, they said he did not get a fair hearing and sent it to the lower courts to be reheard. It’s the civil equivalent of getting a new trial without ruling on the merits of the bakers first amendment claims. The real winner is due process.
Colorado Civil Rights Commission did not view the baker’s case with “religious neutrality. And neither did the Illinois Human Rights Commission’ view the B&B owner’s case with religious neutrality when they persecuted Jim Walder for exercising his constitutionally protected right to religious freedom. And in my opinion it was a willful failure by the Illinois Human Rights Commission to consider Jim Walder’s constitutionally protected rights; there were TWO homosexual rights activists on the committee who made the decision to find Walder guilty of discrimination and fine him $80,000 !!!
I think an important question that needs answered is why is it so many lower courts refused to consider the Colorado baker’s constitutionally protected religious freedom. In my opinion all those incompetent lower court judges should be impeached and removed from the bench. America deserves a fair and impartial judiciary, not judicial tyranny.