28.5 F
Chicago
Thursday, March 30, 2023
HomeHealth CareIL Democrat rep pulls attempt to make unvaccinated pay their own hospital...

IL Democrat rep pulls attempt to make unvaccinated pay their own hospital bills

Date:

spot_img

{1014E3F8-887D-4889-804E-95E5457B46BB}CHICAGO – State Rep. Jonathan Carroll of Chicago has tabled a measure he introduced last week that would force unvaccinated persons to pay their own medical bills if they were to need hospitalization with COVID. 

The bill would have anyone eligible that refuses a vaccination would be punished by losing their healthcare insurance coverage for COVID-related costs.

Although Governor Pritzker did not publicly state his position on the bill, Republican primary candidate State Sen. Darren Bailey blasted the effort Thursday.

"Using the force of government to punish and attack private citizens over private healthcare decisions is something you would expect in countries like North Korea or China, but never in America," Bailey said. "I honestly don't know what he was thinking, but sadly, it aligns with the dangerous, big-government policies JB Pritzker and Democrats continue to push."

The bill, HB 4259, was introduced on Monday, and after a strong reaction, the rep tabled the bill three days later:

Screen Shot 2021-12-10 at 1.00.15 PM

Bailey's full statement as posted on Facebook:
Liberal and out-of-touch, State Rep. Jonathan Carroll, who was pushing HB 4259, legislation to remove healthcare coverage from unvaccinated people who get COVID, has decided not to pursue it due to obvious backlash over this dangerous and anti-American idea. We live in a free country where you can make these decisions for yourself and your family.
 
Using the force of government to punish and attack private citizens over private healthcare decisions is something you would expect in countries like North Korea or China, but never in America. I honestly don't know what he was thinking, but sadly, it aligns with the dangerous, big-government policies JB Pritzker and Democrats continue to push.
 
I support ensuring anyone who wants and needs a vaccine has access to receive one. In addition, I support working with local and county health departments to provide residents information to discuss with their private doctors and make the best decisions for themselves and their families.
 
My office has helped numerous people who wanted a vaccine gain access and get one. When the COVID-19 vaccine became available, I called the Governor's office to help streamline the process for those seeking one in my district.
 
Still, I will never support forcing citizens of a free country to choose between giving up their healthcare freedom and feeding their families. And I will never support using the force of the government to punish private citizens who make these decisions by trying to remove their healthcare coverage because they didn't receive a vaccine.
 
The role of government is to educate, not mandate. We must work to provide resources and information to combat the pandemic, but we must put an end to these statewide mandates and attacks from Pritzker and other out-of-touch politicians in Springfield and restore common sense.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

ISRA: IGOLD 2023

The Illinois Gun Owner Lobby Day (IGOLD) is the...

California Dreaming?

Is it possible that our legislators are trying their best to make Illinois the California of the Midwest, without the mountains or beautiful weather? Our Governors, most certainly, are competing. Both have wildly inflated egos, both ignored their own directives during the height of the pandemic, and both have designs on the White House. The post California Dreaming? appeared first on Illinois Family Institute.

3 COMMENTS

  1. why should my vaccinated taxes pay for your unvaccinated asses? guess whose making the cost of healthcare insurance go up for everybody because of their “personal” decisions?
    smokers know about this… look it up.

  2. Let’s begin with the fact that your “vaccine” doesn’t immunize which means it is not a vaccine. The CDC acknowledges this by quietly and conveniently changing the definition on behalf of its Pharma masters.
    Secondly, it is clear now that the vaccine is not protecting the patient nor anyone else as many (most?) new cases / hospitalizations are patients who were double vaccinated and some received even a third. That’s not exactly a success story.
    Most important to your point: there is no evidence that the unvaccinated are lepers passing disease.
    As for your ludicrous comparison re smoking, there are zero health benefits to smoking and the damages have been quantifiable for DECADES. Vaccination on the other hand may actually have benefit because the side effects of the vaccine are now mounting, and these include permanent injury and death. Moreover, even if the vaccinated did pass along disease, it would be impossible to know who passed it to who and how severe the consequences were or the costs involved. If you’re referring to the unvaccinated themselves becoming ill, it’s impossible to determine if the lack of vaccine had any involvement with becoming ill. There are simply too many uncertainties that you’re totally ignoring.
    The fact that you’re comfortable with bankrupting your fellow citizens because they chose to make a rational and personal health care decision that has ZERO effect on you is appalling and scary.