32.9 F
Chicago
Wednesday, November 30, 2022
HomeBusinessOrganized Labor Was Just Given Untold Power In Negotiations

Organized Labor Was Just Given Untold Power In Negotiations

Date:

spot_img

JB Pritzker has just given near unlimited power to organized labor inside of Illinois following the midterm elections, with the passage of the “Right To Work Act.”

Amendments to the Illinois constitution are rare events, and they require substantial public support. When an amendment is proposed, it must garner 60% of the vote (from the people voting on it), or 50% of the total votes cast, or it fails. But, the biggest indicator for the conservative crowd as to whether or not this amendment was a good thing was the insane amount of money being spent to make sure this passed.

Despite the amendment’s passage, the Illinois Policy Institute, a conservative think tank that ran the “Vote No on Amendment 1” campaign committee, declined to concede the initiative on election night.

IPI president and CEO, Matt Paprocki, commented, “The State Board of Elections is the ultimate authority on this issue. Right now, the amendment is getting just over 50% of total voters in a low turnout year, despite opponents spending $16 million.”

However, Pritzker and labor leaders proclaimed victory following AP’s call, noting that Illinois is now one of only four states that guarantees collective bargaining rights. Experts have said that Illinois’s guarantee exceeds those in New York, Missouri, and Hawaii. The amendment not only guarantees the right to organize for the most common elements of collective bargaining, such as wages, hours and working conditions, but also has additions for “economic welfare and safety at work.”

It is also the first time that a state has banned right-to-work laws through a constitutional amendment. By allowing workers to avoid paying fair share fees to unions, right-to-work laws disempower unions. Union fees are used for nonpolitical activities such as collective bargaining.

What JB Pritzker and union bosses just did was take away every local employer’s ability to negotiate wages appropriately with public union representatives. A public union will also be able to negotiate and receive whatever it wants at the bargaining table under the amendment. This includes police, fire, and other public safety employees who cannot walk off their jobs at the moment. Those in public unions will be able to bargain over the right to strike under the amendment. Additionally, the amendment will prevent the state or local units of government from creating any laws or ordinances that prohibit unlimited giveaways at the bargaining table — allowing public sector unions to demand and receive unlimited pay and benefits- all while feeding that money back to the Union coffers and to politicians’ pockets and campaign coffers.

As a result of the amendment, no law or local ordinance will allow individuals to decide whether or not to join a union without losing their jobs. Thus, employees will be forced to join a union already entrenched at their employer in order to keep their jobs under this measure. This amendment effectively prevents Illinois from ever becoming a right-to-work state, even though it is currently a NON right-to-work state – well not any more.
This Amendment was designed to, forever, allow public unions to control Springfield. Its not like they didn’t already- but now it is in the state’s constitution.

So, what options remain to the public to fight this?

Unfortunately not many. But there are opportunities for us to continue to ask questions, get organized and try to fight this in court, or have the amendment removed during the next election cycle. In the meantime please reach out to the ILGOP, and your local Republican officials (what few there are) and ask them why they did not fight harder to get this done. Albeit there are many staunch conservatives who did fight this tooth and nail, but we all know the Representatives and Senators who focused more on their races, and cared little for ballot initiatives, or for the State Supreme court races in which the Democrats grew their supermajority on.

Elections have consequences.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

Di Leo: Asking the Wrong Question About the Taylor Swift Tour

By John F. Di LeoThe lovely and prolific Taylor...

Opinion: Why the GOP Needs Trump Voters to Survive

By Hank Beckman, Opinion ContributorDonald John Trump is running...

Rossi: The Insane “Climate Reparations” That President Biden Just Agreed To

By Randy Rossi, Opinion ContributorJust when you think President...

4 COMMENTS

  1. This unconstitutional amendment violates the definition of constitutional rights. Constitutional rights as defined by the law of our Declaration of Independence are unalienable rights. From a legal dictionary: Inalienable right – Personal rights held by an individual which are not bestowed by government law, custom, or belief, and which cannot be taken or given away, or transferred to another person, are referred to as “inalienable rights.” Inalienable rights come from our creator’s natural law, while there is a right to work, there is NOT an inalienable right to organized a union. While many in state govt think they are God, organizing a union is a man-made privilege, I say privilege, because man-made rights can be taken versus unchangeable inalienable rights . We held our inalienable rights before there was ever the US Constitution.

    ARTICLE I
    BILL OF RIGHTS
    SECTION 1. INHERENT AND INALIENABLE RIGHTS
    All men are by nature free and independent and have
    certain inherent and inalienable rights among which are life,
    liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To secure these rights
    and the protection of property, governments are instituted
    among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
    governed. (Source: Illinois Constitution.)

    The law breakers in Springfield think they can redefine historical word meanings to accommodate their communist like agenda. The fact is amendment 1 is NOT AN INHERENT AND INALIENABLE RIGHT and has NO place in the Illinois Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is to contain only INHERENT AND INALIENABLE RIGHTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Error correction, This statement “This unconstitutional amendment violates the definition of constitutional rights. Constitutional rights as defined by the law of our Declaration of Independence are unalienable rights. ” Should read : This unconstitutional amendment violates the definition of constitutionally protected rights. Constitutionally protected rights as defined by the law of our Declaration of Independence and are unalienable rights.

  2. As I see it, there’s only three ways to fight the public sector unions in Illinois at this point:

    1) Go hard in contract negotiations. Knock-down, drag-out slugfests with the local government unions. If they walk out and go on strike, take away their health insurance, hire scabs, and privatize and abolish what you can where you can. Fight for every taxpayer dollar.

    2) Municipal and local government bankruptcy. Federal law trumps state law, even state constitutions. If Republicans ever get a semblance of power back in Springfield, they need to get municipal and local government bankruptcy authorized and legalized so that any city or local government in this state can get bankruptcy protection. It’s the nuclear option for these cities and local governments. If the public sector unions want to bleed people dry, the community can actually have a last resort, and it can be used as a bargaining chip: push a city too hard, they go through bankruptcy. Eventually, at the federal level we’ll probably need to push for state bankruptcy for Illinois.

    3) Get a pension amendment to the Illinois state constitution. This is the least likely of the three, but probably the most important. Without an amendment, there will be no way to get real pension reform. Even if you switch all the government workers to 401(k)-style plans, all the unions would have to do is ask for a pension and if the government gave them one in negotiations, it would trump pension law.

    Aside from all that, we could just leave the state.