CLEVELAND - "So now do you finally accept the fact that the ‘Never Trump’ is nevermore?" Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager asked in a telephone interview with the Washington Post as he was driven back to his apartment. "Period. End of sentence."
The Republicans that worked to overturn 14 million GOP primary voters' pick failed Thursday night in Cleveland, and Manafort explained his take on what happened to the Washington Post:
First of all, the fairness of the argument was persuasive to people. Secondly, we have a machine, a political organization that we’ve been telling you about. And three, to those people who were not part of 'Never Trump,' they realized the race was over. And to try and change the rules now would destroy the party. It was a combination of people who were for Trump, people who care about the party and people who were persuaded by the moral argument as well.
All the money that was spent by the Never Trump people, they weren’t even delegates. They’re sitting on the sidelines pretending that they had these votes, which they never did. I never had any doubt. I was never worried that they would get 28 votes. Plus, I was never worried that if they did that it would matter on the floor.
It never had any credibility and there was never going to be anything to carry the floor. You saw the arguments being made. It wasn’t persuasive, it was desperation, it was meanness, people trying to break the system. It just wasn’t going to be credible.
This convention is going to be a unifying convention. You’re going to see over the next five days the party coming together. I’m talking about on the convention floor, at the podium, and the distraction of the rules fight and the platform fight were just distractions. They were never threats.
If you look back at this week, the platform hearings and now the rules hearings, we had a very good week. We have a platform that has Trump’s campaign positions all over it. and you’ve got the rules that were adopted that did two things. One, it took out Never Trump but it also will be calling for a commission to be formed to discuss the issues Trump talked about in the primaries. From our standpoint, this was not the time to tinker with the rules, but after he’s president – based on the commission that’s formed – we’ll deal with an investigation and figure out how best to make the system fairer and more transparent.
More of the interview with Manafort HERE.
Shoot! Pat Brady was proven wrong again. So much for his influential interview with Bill Cameron.
Mr DiLeo, are you still with us?
LakeCoConserv – that same comment goes for Mr. Rhoads as well.
I suppose I misunderstood “Never Trump.” I think I will stick with my understanding, which has nothing to do with who gets nominated by the not much better than Democrat Party at its convention.
Pat Brady said it all. The “Never-Trump” advocates think four years of Hillary (Obama’s third term) would be so disastrous that the Republicans could sweep the 2020 elections with any candidate who could fog a mirror (never a requirement for Democrats – candidate or voter).
Forget that three or four liberal justices appointed to the Supreme Court would change the country for generations to come. The only organizations allowed to contribute to elections would be labor unions, and conservatives would be taxed twice just to make sure. Local police would be disbanded in favor of a national security force, spiffy boots and all, and self defense would be restricted to rocks and butter knives.