• Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • World News
  • Second Amendment
Wednesday, May 14, 2025
Illinois Review
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • World News
  • Second Amendment
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • World News
  • Second Amendment
No Result
View All Result
Illinois Review
No Result
View All Result
Home Illinois News

Orient: Why Do We Need a Right-to-Try Bill in America?

Illinois Review by Illinois Review
June 13, 2018
in Illinois News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
26
SHARES
431
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Hdr-hospice

You might also like

Weyermuller: Saint Jude March for Fallen Chicago Police Officers 2025

Kristi Noem Deports Two During Illinois Visit, Criticizes Pritzker for Sanctuary Policies During Press Conference with Victims’ Families

Pritzker Rebukes ‘Do-Nothing Democrats’ who ‘Lack Guts, Gumption’ Over Trans and Immigrant Scapegoating Following 2024 Losses

By Jane M. Orient, M.D. –

Congress recently passed, and President Trump signed, the “Right to Try” bill that gives dying patients limited access to drugs that have not yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Our Founders would be astonished that we need such a bill. Nowhere does the U.S. Constitution give the federal government the authority to regulate the practice of medicine. And it is a very good thing that federal intervention and standards didn’t begin in 1789.

Standards are always based on what the authorities think are “best practices.” Until rather recently, most medical treatment was ineffective and often quite harmful: e.g. bleeding, purging, and toxic medications like calomel (mercury). Those were nevertheless the “standard of care,” accepted by the American Medical Association (AMA). The chances that a patient would benefit from seeing a doctor were probably no better than 50-50.

Then came scientific medicine and modern medical miracles. Antibiotics conquered many infectious diseases; I may have seen one of the last patients with a thoracoplasty—his chest wall caved in from removing ribs to collapse a tuberculous lung. Leukemia used to be incurable. Kidney failure meant rapid death.

We have many wonderful treatments today. But people are still dying. Their cancer, for example, may not respond to available chemotherapy. They may have heard of a promising new remedy. But it can’t possibly be approved for years, after at least a billion dollars’ worth of testing. It might not work for them—but there’s nothing else. It might be very toxic—just like other anti-cancer drugs. It might even kill them—but they are dying anyway. What have they got to lose?

From this bill they might not have much to gain. It simply expands access to drugs already in clinical trials, for which a patient might not qualify, possibly because of being too sick.

Opponents of this bill, and similar ones in various states, focus on the potential harm to society by weakening the gatekeeper role of the FDA. Patients might be enticed to spend money on “false hope.” Potential subjects might be less willing to volunteer for clinical trials—in which there is a chance they will be “randomized” to NOT receive the new drug. “Quacks” might take advantage of the law. Patients who are not wealthy wouldn’t be able to get experimental drugs not covered by insurance. Worst of all, future patients might not be willing to wait for the FDA—and the willingness of somebody to spend billions to win approval of a cheap or nonpatentable product that will never turn a profit.

All treatments are potentially dangerous, and the dangers may not appear until many have been exposed. This is why many doctors are not “early adopters.” The patients enrolled in formal trials are just as likely to suffer harm as those who are not. The goal is to make the world aware of the danger sooner—which will happen only if unfavorable studies are honestly published instead of being covered up. Unfortunately, the evidence base for highly touted “evidence-based medicine” may be highly corrupted.

The “most vulnerable” need to be protected, we often hear. But who is actually being protected? Patients? Or the academic research establishment? The prestigious organizations that write the “guidelines” and determine the “standard of care”? The medical journals that publish the approved research? The companies that sell the extremely expensive products that have no competition? Insurers that profit more from higher premiums to cover these treatments? Pharmacy benefits managers who collect a bigger “rebate” on higher priced products?

As Goldman Sachs pointed out, curing disease is bad for business.

With speedy innovation, such as adult stem cells, “regulators have not been able to keep up,” according to a May 17 editorial in Nature. Therefore, scientists should consider slowing down?

This “cruel sham” and “ugly placebo” powerful enough to do grave harm to the current regime won’t do patients any good, it is argued.  It might harm them by shortening their last 4 weeks of life or making them sicker. Should patients not be allowed to choose to take that risk, at their own expense?

One must suspect that the real fear is that the treatment might actually work. If innovators were allowed to take risks, our descendants might view 2018 medicine the same way that we see the treatments of 1789. And how the modern medical equivalents of buggy-whip manufacturers would suffer!

Jane M. Orient, M.D. obtained her undergraduate degrees in chemistry and mathematics from the University of Arizona in Tucson, and her M.D. from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1974. She completed an internal medicine residency at Parkland Memorial Hospital and University of Arizona Affiliated Hospitals and then became an Instructor at the University of Arizona College of Medicine and a staff physician at the Tucson Veterans Administration Hospital.

Related

Share10Tweet7
Previous Post

Judge blocks Deerfield assault weapon ban hours before taking effect

Next Post

Thorner: Heartland Institute celebrates first year with Huelskamp at the helm

Illinois Review

Illinois Review

Founded in 2005, Illinois Review is the leading perspective and source of conservative news, opinion and information in Illinois. Follow Illinois Review on X at @IllinoisReview.

Recommended For You

Ex-Deerfield HS Coach Charged with Child Pornography Months After Middle School Sparked National Outrage After Forcing Girls to Change in Front of Transgender Boy

by Mark Vargas
May 12, 2025
0
Ex-Deerfield HS Coach Charged with Child Pornography Months After Middle School Sparked National Outrage After Forcing Girls to Change in Front of Transgender Boy

By Illinois ReviewA former Deerfield High School volunteer wrestling coach and district-wide social media coordinator has been arrested and charged with possessing child pornography, according to official statements....

Read moreDetails

Weyermuller: Saint Jude March for Fallen Chicago Police Officers 2025

by Mark Weyermuller
May 8, 2025
0
Weyermuller: Saint Jude March for Fallen Chicago Police Officers 2025

By Mark Weyermuller, Events ContributorLast Sunday, bag pipes and drums led a march to honor Chicago Police Officers who have died in the line of duty over the...

Read moreDetails

Kristi Noem Deports Two During Illinois Visit, Criticizes Pritzker for Sanctuary Policies During Press Conference with Victims’ Families

by Illinois Review
May 7, 2025
0
Kristi Noem Deports Two During Illinois Visit, Criticizes Pritzker for Sanctuary Policies During Press Conference with Victims’ Families

By Illinois ReviewOn Wednesday, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem visited Springfield to meet with families who lost loved ones to crimes committed by undocumented immigrants – cases she...

Read moreDetails

Pritzker Rebukes ‘Do-Nothing Democrats’ who ‘Lack Guts, Gumption’ Over Trans and Immigrant Scapegoating Following 2024 Losses

by Illinois Review
May 6, 2025
0
Pritzker Rebukes ‘Do-Nothing Democrats’ who ‘Lack Guts, Gumption’ Over Trans and Immigrant Scapegoating Following 2024 Losses

By Illinois ReviewIll. Gov. JB Pritzker – a progressive liberal who inherited billions from his family’s hotel business, is attacking his own party for blaming far-left progressive policies...

Read moreDetails

Pritzker Demands Mass Protests Against MAGA Agenda During NH Speech: ‘Republicans Cannot Know Peace’

by Illinois Review
April 28, 2025
0
Pritzker Demands Mass Protests Against MAGA Agenda During NH Speech: ‘Republicans Cannot Know Peace’

By Illinois ReviewAt a Democratic dinner in New Hampshire on Sunday, Ill. Gov. JB Pritzker – a progressive liberal who inherited billions from his family’s hotel business –...

Read moreDetails
Next Post

Thorner: Heartland Institute celebrates first year with Huelskamp at the helm

Please login to join discussion

Best Dental Group

Related News

IL Freedom Caucus calls on Lurie Children’s Hospital to cease gender services for kids

October 27, 2022

Beckman: Is the Brigham Young University racial slur controversy another hoax?

October 27, 2022

Salvi polling shows closer race

October 27, 2022

Browse by Category

  • America First
  • Education
  • Faith & Family
  • Foreign Policy
  • Health Care
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • Opinion
  • Science
  • Second Amendment
  • TRENDING
  • US NEWS
  • US Politics
  • World News
Illinois Review

© 2024 llinois Review LLC Editor in Chief Mark Vargas Publisher Thomas McCullagh Chief Counsel Scott Kaspar

Navigate Site

  • Checkout
  • Home
  • Home – mobile
  • Login/Register
  • Login/Register
  • My account
  • My Account-
  • My Account- – mobile

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • Health Care
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • TRENDING
  • Education
  • Foreign Policy
  • Second Amendment
  • Faith & Family
  • Science
  • World News

© 2024 llinois Review LLC Editor in Chief Mark Vargas Publisher Thomas McCullagh Chief Counsel Scott Kaspar

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?