• Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • World News
  • Second Amendment
Tuesday, September 2, 2025
Illinois Review
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • World News
  • Second Amendment
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • World News
  • Second Amendment
No Result
View All Result
Illinois Review
No Result
View All Result
Home Illinois News

“Heads I win, tails you lose” – Mayor Emanuel’s real motivations for Chicago’s $10 billion pension bond

Illinois Review by Illinois Review
October 27, 2022
in Illinois News
Reading Time: 11 mins read
A A
0
26
SHARES
434
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Unnamed (1)

You might also like

Illinois GOP Leader Larry Smith Advises Against Attending Pro-Second Amendment Meeting

Chicago Mayor Claims ‘Affordable Housing’ is the Key to Reducing Crime in Awkward MSNBC Interview

Pritzker Threatens Backers of National Guard in Chicago During Press Conference: ‘We’re Taking Names’

By Ted Dabrowski, President, Wirepoints - 

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s team claims its proposed $10 billion pension obligation bond is good fiscal policy. Far from it. The POBs, as the bonds are called, are nothing more than a gamble using taxpayer funds. They’re a terrible idea.

But bad policy has never stopped a Chicago politician. Emanuel’s motivation for pushing the bonds is the upcoming mayoral election. He faces ten challengers and they’re slinging all kinds of mud on him, in particular for his record as a property tax hiker and his failures on policing. Emanuel’s looking to deflect those challenges. He thinks he’s found a way using POBs.

Emanuel hiked property taxes by more than $800 million during his first two terms in office, and yet the city’s pension mess continues to worsen. As a result, required taxpayer contributions are set to double to $2.2 billion by 2022. Absent some “solution,” property taxes will have to go up dramatically and Emanuel won’t be able to defend himself on the campaign trail. It’s a loser position.

And Emanuel is still negotiating the city’s police and fire labor contracts that expired more than a year ago. The prickly one, of course, is the police contract. The mayor’s mess there is more than just about pay and incentives. He’s got a real crisis – from the handling of the Laquan McDonald video to transparency and settlement scandals – that has damaged his relationship with the department.

The POB is all about accessing money now to assuage both groups. But all Chicagoans – residents, media and civic institutions – should refuse to buy into this deal. This bond is no different than the Skyway and parking meter contracts or the more recent securitized borrowings. They’re all deals that caused Chicagoans long-term pain in exchange for some politician’s short-term gain.

POBs and Emanuel’s short-term gains

Emanuel’s upcoming property tax hike problem
The bonds require the city to reach out to Wall Street banks and borrow $10 billion, which would more than double the city’s general debt. The city will then take the $10 billion and pour it into its four city-run pension funds. The funded levels of the pension funds will increase from a collective 26 percent to more than 50 percent – a dramatic jump. By pre-funding the pension funds with such a large amount, the higher funding ratios will lower the city’s required taxpayer contributions over the next few years significantly, removing the pressure for tax hikes.

But this plan won’t work if the massive taxpayer pension contributions disappear only to have them replaced by equally big repayments toward the $10 billion borrowing. So expect Emanuel to structure the repayment of the $10 billion debt so it’s far, far off into the future.

With all the financial engineering in place, Emanuel can then run on the promise that he won’t hike property taxes his next term. Problem solved.

Emanuel’s unsigned police contract
Emanuel needs serious leverage if he’s to put his police contract negotiations to rest in a way that gives him power going into the elections. He’s got that power in the POBs.

The police plan is just 23 percent funded. Fire is just 20 percent funded. By any measure those systems are broke. Public safety workers, and the unions that represent them, know this. Pensions haven’t been a priority during negotiations for years. But now that pension checks are close to bouncing, they’re the hot topic.

If Emanuel can offer to take the two plans’ funded ratios to 50 percent by putting in billions of fresh money, he gets the real leverage he’s been looking for. “Sign the labor contracts and I’ll take your pensions away from the brink,” he can tell the unions. With that, Emanuel can buy labor peace with the police and fire unions right before the elections.

The pitch to Chicagoans… and the truth
To make the bond deal happen, Emanuel has to sell it hard. Listen to his CFO Carole Brown and other surrogates like Ralph Martire of the CTBA and you’ll hear nothing but how POBs are good policy.

They’re saying Chicago can borrow more cheaply. That the pension crisis will be defused. That this makes city finances more healthy. And all at little-to-no-risk to Chicagoans. “If I can create a structure that can re-fund some of my higher cost pension debt with lower-cost bonded debt, then I can save money for taxpayers,” said Brown.

None of that is true.

Borrowing more money to pay down debts doesn’t solve anything, especially when you have a borrowing problem. At its core, the POB only moves $10 billion in city debt from one pile (pension debt) to another (general debt). Emanuel claims he’s ended the irresponsible practice of “scoop and toss” borrowing. But the pension bond is scoop and toss in everything but name.

2. There are no guaranteed savings from issuing the bonds. Instead, the bond requires taking a massive risk with taxpayer dollars. The whole POB proposal is a gamble with taxpayer money. Officials hope to borrow at 5 percent, invest it in the stock market and make a profit. The problem is, the market can go the other way and the funds can lose money in the process. And taxpayers will be left holding the bag.

Many other governments – San Bernardino, Detroit, New Jersey and Puerto Rico – have gambled on POBs and ended up losing money in the market. Closer to home, the CTA issued a $1.9 billion pension bond in 2008 that turned into a debacle when the recession hit.

3. What it does for the pension plans is illusory. Pension obligation bonds do not address the real problems with defined benefit plans. They are not reforms. Instead, they just hide and perpetuate the underlying problems. Illinois’ $10 billion and the CTA’s $1.9 billion pension bonds are two good examples of can kicking where the pension funds only got worse afterward.

4. The expected tax hikes don’t disappear. They just get shoved further into the future. If the POB goes through, Emanuel will be more than happy to tell Chicagoans he saved them billions in near-term tax hikes. What he won’t tell Chicagoans is that they’ll pay those tax hikes later. That’s because he’ll push the bond repayments far into the future – and way past his tenure.

Just look at how former Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s POB was structured. In 2003, the state borrowed $10 billion to fund pensions. Today, 15 years later, the state still owes $9 billion in principal, never mind the interest still owed. If the graphic looks a lot like Gov. Edgar’s failed 1996 pension payment ramp, that’s because it does.

Unnamed

Mortgaging Chicago’s future

If it wasn’t clear how self-serving this whole plan is, consider the fact that Emanuel is doing this at what could be the worst possible time to play the arbitrage game. The U.S. is experiencing its longest ever bull-market and it’s not unreasonable to expect a correction.

But that’s how selfish Chicago politicians are. Emanuel is willing to gamble with taxpayer money just to win the election.

For him, it’s “heads I win, tails you lose.”

Related

Tags: Illinois Review
Share10Tweet7
Previous Post

Time to subscribe to Illinois Review

Next Post

Rhoads: Fake debate in Florida Gov. Race

Illinois Review

Illinois Review

Recommended For You

Illinois GOP Leader Larry Smith Advises Against Attending Pro-Second Amendment Meeting

by Illinois Review
August 28, 2025
0
Illinois GOP Leader Larry Smith Advises Against Attending Pro-Second Amendment Meeting

By Illinois ReviewLarry Smith, a member of the Illinois Republican Party State Central Committee and chairman of the LaSalle County GOP, reportedly urged people not to attend a...

Read moreDetails

Chicago Mayor Claims ‘Affordable Housing’ is the Key to Reducing Crime in Awkward MSNBC Interview

by Illinois Review
August 26, 2025
0
Chicago Mayor Claims ‘Affordable Housing’ is the Key to Reducing Crime in Awkward MSNBC Interview

By Illinois ReviewDuring a Tuesday appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson sidestepped questions about the city’s police shortage, instead insisting that “affordable housing” is the...

Read moreDetails

Pritzker Threatens Backers of National Guard in Chicago During Press Conference: ‘We’re Taking Names’

by Illinois Review
August 25, 2025
0
Pritzker Threatens Backers of National Guard in Chicago During Press Conference: ‘We’re Taking Names’

By Illinois ReviewAt a dramatic Monday afternoon press conference in downtown Chicago – flanked by nearly every major Democrat in the region – Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker delivered...

Read moreDetails

Sources: GOP Mega-Donor Dick Uihlein Sitting Out Illinois Governor Primary

by Illinois Review
August 25, 2025
0
Sources: GOP Mega-Donor Dick Uihlein Sitting Out Illinois Governor Primary

By Illinois ReviewAs the Republican primary for Illinois governor takes shape, billionaire mega-donor Richard Uihlein’s name is once again circulating in political circles.In recent weeks, advisers connected to...

Read moreDetails

From Murder Capital to Migrant Crisis: Why Trump Must Deploy the National Guard to Chicago

by Mark Vargas
August 24, 2025
0
From Murder Capital to Migrant Crisis: Why Trump Must Deploy the National Guard to Chicago

By Rod Blagojevich and Mark Vargas OpinionWhile Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson tout drops in homicides, robberies and shootings, the fact is Chicago remains...

Read moreDetails
Next Post

Rhoads: Fake debate in Florida Gov. Race

Please login to join discussion

Best Dental Group

Related News

IL Freedom Caucus calls on Lurie Children’s Hospital to cease gender services for kids

October 27, 2022

Beckman: Is the Brigham Young University racial slur controversy another hoax?

October 27, 2022

Salvi polling shows closer race

October 27, 2022

Browse by Category

  • America First
  • Education
  • Faith & Family
  • Foreign Policy
  • Health Care
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • Opinion
  • Science
  • Second Amendment
  • TRENDING
  • US NEWS
  • US Politics
  • World News
Illinois Review

llinois Review LLC Editor-in-Chief Mark Vargas General Counsel Scott Kaspar Copyright © 2025 IR Media Corp., all rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • Checkout
  • Home
  • Home – mobile
  • Login/Register
  • Login/Register
  • My account
  • My Account-
  • My Account- – mobile

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • Health Care
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • TRENDING
  • Education
  • Foreign Policy
  • Second Amendment
  • Faith & Family
  • Science
  • World News

llinois Review LLC Editor-in-Chief Mark Vargas General Counsel Scott Kaspar Copyright © 2025 IR Media Corp., all rights reserved.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?