11.6 F
Chicago
Friday, February 3, 2023
HomeBusinessDi Leo: Federal Reserve Action Just a Drop in the Bucket

Di Leo: Federal Reserve Action Just a Drop in the Bucket

Date:

spot_img

Fed chicago

By John F. Di Leo - 

The Federal Reserve System is raising interest rates at last.  It's about time.
 
If you've been putting off refinancing your house, it's probably a good time for it; rates won't get any lower.
 
The business pages say that the Federal Reserve is finally doing its job. They say that keeping inflation in check (well, really, keeping the dollar steady, stable and respected might be a better way to put it) is the Fed's purpose, and that is certainly true.
 
But it's not the whole story… and if you believe the media line that rate hikes from the Fed alone will put an end to this spiraling inflation, I have the deed to a beautiful bridge to sell you.

 
The First Bank of the United States
 
When thinking about federal policy, it never hurts to go back to the Founding Era, and remember where it all began.
 
During the War of Independence, we financed everything – our soldiers' salaries, their pensions and signing bonuses, their uniforms and arms, their powder and ammo – on credit.  We sold bonds domestically, we took out foreign loans; we promised to pay our soldiers after we won.
 
Throughout that period, our "Continental" currency lost value every year, since our economy was a disaster area – as one would expect the economy of a war-torn nation to be.  Even once we won the war, our weak government inspired so little confidence in the global business community, our money – issued by states and individual banks – remained virtually worthless.  
 
A common insult for anything of limited value was the saying "not worth a Continental." Even our very language dismissed the American dollar as useless.  Barter was the currency of the day, and you can't build a prosperous modern economy on that.
 
Two, three, four, five years after the peace was signed at the Hotel d'York in France, some states had still not paid their soldiers… and some states proudly had paid their debts, but with money so severely devalued that their payments really didn't do anybody much good.   
 
The first economic goal of the Washington administration – as designed so brilliantly by Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton – was to take this outstanding war debt federal, to be paid by a new national bank, and the confidence this move would inspire would itself provide the needed foundation for a new economic system.
 
It was the stability of this new bank, and this nationally-accepted commitment to honor our debts, that spurred the economic boom of the 1790s.  The fact of its presence, more than any specific choice made by the bank itself, stabilized the United States Dollar in those days.
 
Alexander Hamilton Chicago Monument
(the Chicago monument to Secretary Alexander Hamilton)
 
The Federal Reserve Bank Today
 
Today's Fed is a far cry from that first Bank of the United States.  We are a much bigger country today, so perhaps it's reasonable that the federal bank is huge as well, but it's difficult to imagine our Founding Fathers ever anticipating the federal government's bank growing so big and so influential. The Washington-Hamilton plan was to enable the private sector to be prosperous; they hoped for countless entrepreneurs and countless private banks to serve them.
 
Today's Fed officially sets the money supply, directs the printing of currency, even sets policy on how all those countless private banks maintain their reserve levels.  It has morphed beyond the original idea of "the government's bank" to become an additional regulatory body.
 
Along with this considerable growth in its responsibilities, there has been a concurrent abdication of responsibility by the rest of our government.  
 
When inflation threatens, politicians of both parties tap the brims of their hats respectfully and remind the crowd that "inflation is the Fed's role…. we hope they'll do their job and take care of us."  Sure sounds like a dodge to me.
 
The Fed has become one of the politician's favorite tools, an easy place to point when the questions get hard, an easy scapegoat, toward which all blame for economic ills may be deflected.
 
But is that fair?
 
Economics in the Real World
 
Economists talk about the contraction or expansion of the money supply, and we laymen can relate when they put it terms like the interest rates on home mortgages, but frankly, though they don't like to admit it, the vast majority of what happens in the economy is out of the Fed's hands.
 
What does inflation really mean, anyway?  It means your dollar buys less; it means that prices are going up.  But why are those prices going up?  Not because of the Fed, folks.  Oh no.  Not because of the Fed.
 
And if a problem isn't caused by the Fed, it stands to reason that there's a limit to just how much the Fed can really do to solve the problem.
 
Real Causes and Real Solutions
 
Stimuli – Congress has passed, and presidents have signed, trillions and trillions of dollars in stimulus programs in recent decades, and especially since the beginning of the "pandemic" associated with the China Virus.  These have all been unfunded, meaning, they have been on top of existing government budgets that were already in deficit territory.  Government overspending either raises taxes immediately, raises taxes in the future, or is addressed by intentional devaluation.  Either way, these Congressionally-created stimuli – trillions of dollars in checks, printed out of thin air – continually contribute to today's inflation crisis.
 
Welfare Programs – In recent decades, especially under the Obama and Biden regimes, we have maintained an intentionally porous border, practically inviting in (sometimes even paying to fly in) millions of foreigners, outside the normal process of legal immigration.  These illegal aliens and their children are rightly barred from most forms of employment, causing them to work under the radar or not work at all.  
 
As a result, the nation's safety net – programs funded either directly or indirectly by federal, state, county, and even more local governments like cities and townships – has expanded its deliverables. As these taxpayer-funded programs grow, they swell the size of government at every level. This increases the tax burden at every level, from sales taxes to property taxes to income taxes and social security taxes, reducing the real value of each individual's income. It's the very definition of inflationary.
 
Retail Purchasing Power – Whether we buy online or from a brick-and-mortar store, we see prices jump every day. Why?  Well, all goods cost more to get from origin to store, thanks to the ballooning cost of transportation.  Ocean and air import cargo, in particular, now costs four times as much to get here as it did two years ago, due to our local and state government-run seaports refusing to grow along with trade volumes over the years, until they reached a breaking point in 2020.  Federally regulated railroads similarly resisted needed growth, resulting in a nationwide archipelago of railyard bottlenecks just as congested as our seaports. 
 
The foolish environmentalist extremists and union activists of Los Angeles and Sacramento banned half the available trucks from their ports, throwing drivers out of work and contributing to the transportation crisis.  Of course everything on every shelf costs us shoppers more; it costs the store infinitely more to get it for us.
 
Gasoline, Diesel, and Other Forms of Energy – One of the many challenges facing our truck drivers, causing transportation prices to skyrocket, is the one that hits us directly, as consumers, just as hard: the cost of fuel. Whether we drive our own car, minivan or SUV, or take a city bus, commuter train, taxi or Uber, they all have one thing in common: they are powered by energy. From the gasoline and diesel we pour into our vehicles' fuel tanks, to the energy grid that powers the machines in our factories, and heats and cools our homes and offices, all energy in America has skyrocketed in price over the past year.  
 
Some of it is due to a few foolish state regulations, such as the decommissioning of nuclear plants. But most of it is due to thoroughly destructive federal policy, subsidizing inefficient energy sources with tax dollars, and punishing or outright closing off efficient energy sources. Almost immediately upon taking office, the Biden-Harris regime began issuing executive orders, directing agency heads to promulgate rules that instantly slowed exploration, development and production of energy on both public and private lands. 
 
Energy is a commodity; as with any commodity, when there's a shortage – necessary or contrived – its price goes up.  The Biden-Harris regime owns this too, and it's one of the largest drivers of our current inflation crisis.
 
We could go on and on; this is just a sampling.  
 
Why do auto and property insurance premiums go up? Cities, counties and states refuse to prosecute robbers and drunk drivers, returning them to our streets.  Why does rent go up?  Cities raise the property taxes of the landlords, or hike the utilities that landlords build into their rent, or refuse to allow landlords to evict bad tenants, which unavoidably requires the landlords to build more profit into every lease, to be able to afford to carry the deadbeats our government won't let them cut loose.  The list of unforced errors, committed by government, is endless.
 
In short, what causes prices to go up?  What really causes inflation, at its root?
 
Government.
 
It really is as simple as that.  Government choices – to overtax, to overregulate, to strangle production and transportation, to flood the economy with costs, turning what should be the greatest economic engine on earth into a sputtering, struggling old motor – these are the causes of our inflation problem.
 
Should the Fed raise interest rates?  Sure.  It will help a little.
 
But if you want to completely solve the problem – if you want to really set this economy free from top to bottom, so we can return to the prosperous land our Founding Fathers intended for us – then there's only one solution:
 
Throw out the Left at every level.  City, county, state and federal.
 
Changing the president isn't enough; purging the Pelosi/Schumer crowd from control of Congress is just a beginning.
 
The real solution requires focusing on our state capitols and governors' mansions too, and on our county boards and city halls as well.
 
And considering the fact that the year is 2022 – or as we call it in the United States, "a midterm year" – there's really no time like the present.
 

Copyright 2022 John F. Di Leo

John F. Di Leo is a Chicagoland-based trade compliance trainer and transportation manager, writer and actor. A one-time county chairman of the Milwaukee County Republican Party, he has been writing regularly for Illinois Review since 2009.

 A collection of John’s Illinois Review articles about vote fraud, The Tales of Little Pavel, and his 2021 political satires about current events, Evening Soup with Basement Joe, Volumes One and Two, are available, in either paperback or eBook, only on Amazon.

Don’t miss an article! Use the free tool in the margin to sign up for Illinois reviews free email notification service, so that you always know when we publish new content!

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

7 COMMENTS

  1. Nice John. I would elinate the Fed all together. It’s a few banks controlling all the banks. Isn’t that an oligopoly? A few controlling the market. Let money control the market per Milton Friedman.

  2. Wasn’t “The Bank of the United States” the one Andrew Jackson refused to re-charter in the 1830s?
    It was founded by Alexander Hamilton and, by 1830, was run by Nicholas Biddle and a cabal of fellow New England bankers to manipulate trade, rather close to what the Federal Reserve is doing now.
    Jackson was right to kill it then, and it’s time to end the Federal Reserve now.

  3. Interesting that Gerald brought up LaRouche, since he had an unfavorable view of classical liberals yet in the bit of reading on LaRouche I’ve done it seems that both LaRochies and classical liberals alike tend to like hard money as opposed to fiat money. To me, the fiat system seems like the enabler of all the wild fiscal policy. You can say “spend less money” but these lawmakers who vote on the budget are elected by people, often in gerrymandered districts, and represent a vast assortment of special interests that are all rent seekers. (I think both Hamiltonians and Jeffersonians would be appalled by how our government works today.) The incentive structure creates moral hazard and people soon start electing whoever wants to give them the most. It’s hard to see that happening to such an extent if we didn’t use funny money. Or put in simpler terms, most of this article is talking about bad fiscal habits of our government but ignoring the foundation which allows that problem to fester in the first place. It would be a bit like arresting drug users but specifically ignoring drug dealers. Our fiscal nightmare didn’t start in 2021 but we’re starting to feel the heat now that we are losing our status as world hegemony. Trouble is, monetary policy is the third rail. Any politician who deviates from the so-called “consensus” is doomed to irrelevancy by the political parties, media, and other institutions.

  4. Actually, the bank that Old Hickory campaigned on shutting down was The Second Bank of the United States, chartered in 1816, after Hamilton’s bank charter had expired.
    Cool, isn’t it, that we even imposed 20 year charters on a federal bank in those days, but today you can’t get the Democrats to go for a sunset provision on a carton of milk, much less a federal program.
    Regarding LaRouche… well, now that the old man is dead, it’s rather a moot subject, but the LaRouche party always was interesting, in its ability to essentially be completely socialist while using rhetoric designed to appeal to conservatives. I suppose Tulsi Gabbard fills that role today.

  5. Alexander Hamilton was in support of a big, central Federal government.
    His insistence that the Federal excise tax be paid in cash on the sale of their hard cider by western Pennsylvania and New York farmers caused the Whisky Rebellion, because there was little or no real money in those areas to pay Hamilton’s tax. The lack of hard money in those areas had created a ‘barter’ economy.
    The Broadway fiction play “Hamilton” portrays Hamilton as something other than he was.
    In real life, he was a controlling, womanizing
    egotistical, dangerous little man, with monarchist ideas.
    Aaron Burr did the country good service by killing him.