• Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • World News
  • Second Amendment
Tuesday, April 21, 2026
Illinois Review
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • World News
  • Second Amendment
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • World News
  • Second Amendment
No Result
View All Result
Illinois Review
No Result
View All Result
Home Illinois News

Thorner: Conservative groups debate whether or not to Feed the Chicago Bears

Illinois Review by Illinois Review
October 12, 2022
in Illinois News
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
5
Thorner: Conservative groups debate whether or not to Feed the Chicago Bears
27
SHARES
450
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Unknown-9

You might also like

Springfield Lawmakers Name Sandwiches While Illinois Families Face Crime, High Taxes

Insiders vs. Voters: How Illinois Republicans Shut Out Their Own Base

Hundreds Rally in Springfield for IGOLD 2026 as Gun Owners Push Back on Democrat Policies

By Nancy Thorner – 

On Wednesday, September 28, 2022, The Heartland Institute, a free market think tank founded in 1984, with headquarters at 3939 North Wilke Road, Arlington Heights, Illinois, held a discussion/debate titled Please Don’t Feed the Bears?, co-sponsored by Americans for Prosperity Illinois, at The Heartland Institute’s Andrew Breitbart Freedom Center. Brian Costin is the state Deputy Director of Americans for Prosperity.  The debate centered around whether taxpayers should help build a stadium to bring the NFL to Arlington Heights.

Unknown-10

As background, the Chicago Bears signed a purchase agreement for Arlington International Racecourse in September 2021.  A move to the 326-acre property in Arlington Heights would allow the Bears ownership group to build not just a state-of-the-art NFL stadium, but create a modern “destination attraction” with hotels, restaurants, retail stores, offices, and homes.  The sale of the property, to the bears or another buyer, could be announced by the end of this year or early 2023.  As such the future of Chicago, the Bears, and many communities of the Northwest Suburbs could change drastically, and very soon.

Unknown-11

Prior to the debate, Jim Lakely, Vice President of Heartland and Director of Communications, welcomed attendees and further offered a brief history of The Heartland Institute.  Attendees were encouraged to check out Heartland’s podcasts and its many excellent offerings.

The debate featured Brian Costin, who worked at Heartland from 2007 – 2009 and for former Governor Rauner on policy before joining Americans for Prosperity, and James Taylor, President of The Heartland Institute.

Americans for Prosperity’s Costin argued against public subsidies

Although Costin had no opposition to the Bears coming to Arlington Heights, he opposed corporate welfare to build the stadium. 
 
Costin’s presentation focused on the potential impact of tax increment financing, or TIF district, that Arlington Heights could establish as a way to help finance the infrastructure associated with the mixed-use commercial and residential development proposed by the Bears.
 
Said Costin, Do the Bears really need subsidies?  Their net worth is $520 million dollars and their worth is growing in value.
 
The problem is who will pay for all the infrastructure needed such as roads, sidewalks, alleys, curbs, gutters, utility distribution lines, water supply systems, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewer systems, street lighting systems, landscaping, and even a school for students of the residents who will move into the residential development proposed by the Bears?
 
Arlington Heights does have Anti-Corporate Welfare Ordinance that prevents it from offering or extending any financial incentive to any business or corporation to operate in the village.
 
Unknown-12
 
James Taylor’s “devil advocate” argument for publicly funding the project
 
Without village representatives in attendance, even though they were invited, Heartland Institute President James Taylor made what he called a “devil’s advocate” argument for publicly funding the project.
 
Being skeptical of economic benefits, Taylor was concerned they will exceed the cost. 
 
As for the Bears stadium funding, Taylor suggested that public funding consideration also be given to help fund a variety of cultural attractions, especially in the arts. 
 
“Arlington Heights, (according to) publicly available numbers, spends a little over $200,000 each year on its Metropolis Performing Arts Center,” Taylor said. “That facility draws roughly 50,000 attendees per year, which equates to a subsidy of about $4 per attendee.”
 
Taylor said that based on projected attendance levels at a potential Bears stadium, the Bears’ subsidy per fan would actually be lower at about $3 per attendee.
 
“If you’re not going to oppose those other subsidies, I think you have to find a good reason why you would oppose subsidizing the Bears,” Taylor said.
 
Further consideration
 
Americans for Prosperity launched a poll that said 72% of those surveyed in Arlington Heights supported moving the Bears to the village, but 68% opposed using public money to bring them to Arlington Heights.
 
Arlington Heights has taken some preliminary steps regarding redevelopment, including hiring of two consultants for economic impact and traffic analysis.
 
View here the YouTube presentation of The Heartland Institute’s presentation of Please Don’t Feed the Bears?    https://youtu.be/Mu0Yz-IORkM.
The Heartland Institute will hold its 38th annual benefit dinner on Friday, October 22, 2022. It will.be held at the Marriott O’Hare in Chicago, Illinois.  More information at this link: https://benefit.heartland.org/
 
Photos by Mark Weyermuller 

Related

Share11Tweet7
Previous Post

Di Leo: Who Are Today’s Political Parties? What Do They Want?

Next Post

Reject Higher Property Taxes. Vote NO on Amendment 1

Illinois Review

Illinois Review

Founded in 2005, Illinois Review is the leading perspective and source of conservative news, opinion and information in Illinois. Follow Illinois Review on X at @IllinoisReview.

Recommended For You

Springfield Lawmakers Name Sandwiches While Illinois Families Face Crime, High Taxes

by Illinois Review
April 17, 2026
0
Springfield Lawmakers Name Sandwiches While Illinois Families Face Crime, High Taxes

By Illinois ReviewAt a time when Illinois families are struggling under crushing taxes, rising crime, and failing public institutions, lawmakers in Springfield have made their priorities clear –...

Read moreDetails

Insiders vs. Voters: How Illinois Republicans Shut Out Their Own Base

by Jacqueline Garretson
April 17, 2026
1
Insiders vs. Voters: How Illinois Republicans Shut Out Their Own Base

By Jacqueline Garretson, Opinion ContributorIllinois Republicans often talk about rebuilding the party, but rarely do we confront one of the structural decisions that weakened it in the first...

Read moreDetails

Hundreds Rally in Springfield for IGOLD 2026 as Gun Owners Push Back on Democrat Policies

by Illinois Review
April 16, 2026
0
Hundreds Rally in Springfield for IGOLD 2026 as Gun Owners Push Back on Democrat Policies

By Illinois ReviewMore than 500 law-abiding citizens and Second Amendment advocates gathered in Springfield on April 15 for the Illinois State Rifle Association’s annual Illinois Gun Owner Lobby...

Read moreDetails

California Democrats Face Constitutional Backlash for Targeting Journalist Nick Shirley

by Illinois Review
April 14, 2026
0
California Democrats Face Constitutional Backlash for Targeting Journalist Nick Shirley

By Illinois ReviewIndependent journalist Nick Shirley has become a significant thorn in the side of government waste and fraud – and California Democrats now appear determined to stop...

Read moreDetails

Every Republican in Springfield Should Resign for Refusing to Demand FBI Probe Into Pritzker and State Finances

by Illinois Review
April 13, 2026
0
Every Republican in Springfield Should Resign for Refusing to Demand FBI Probe Into Pritzker and State Finances

By Mark Vargas, Editor-in-Chief & Scott Kaspar, PublisherThe evidence is mounting. The warnings are growing louder. And yet, Illinois Republicans in Springfield remain silent.At what point does silence...

Read moreDetails
Next Post
8 Reasons to Vote NO on Amendment 1

Reject Higher Property Taxes. Vote NO on Amendment 1

Please login to join discussion

Best Dental Group

Related News

IL Freedom Caucus calls on Lurie Children’s Hospital to cease gender services for kids

October 27, 2022

Beckman: Is the Brigham Young University racial slur controversy another hoax?

October 27, 2022

Salvi polling shows closer race

October 27, 2022

Browse by Category

  • America First
  • Education
  • Faith & Family
  • Foreign Policy
  • Health Care
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • Opinion
  • Science
  • Second Amendment
  • TRENDING
  • US NEWS
  • US Politics
  • World News
Illinois Review

llinois Review LLC Editor-in-Chief Mark Vargas General Counsel Scott Kaspar Copyright © 2025 IR Media Corp., all rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • Checkout
  • Home
  • Home – mobile
  • Login/Register
  • Login/Register
  • My account
  • My Account-
  • My Account- – mobile

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Illinois News
  • Illinois Politics
  • US Politics
  • Health Care
  • US NEWS
  • America First
  • Opinion
  • TRENDING
  • Education
  • Foreign Policy
  • Second Amendment
  • Faith & Family
  • Science
  • World News

llinois Review LLC Editor-in-Chief Mark Vargas General Counsel Scott Kaspar Copyright © 2025 IR Media Corp., all rights reserved.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?