3.6 F
Friday, February 3, 2023
HomeIllinois NewsRhoads: This week's ERA Senate victory is bogus

Rhoads: This week’s ERA Senate victory is bogus




By Mark Rhoads - 

There is something about due process and the rule of law that the Left never understands.

The Illinois State Senate pretended to ratify the ERA again this week almost four decades after it was first sent by Congress to the states for ratification. Most news outlets gave out information that was not correct. They claimed the deadline was 35 years ago in 1982 but even that date was an illegal extension by Congress.

The real deadline was in 1979, according to the text of the ERA itself.

In other years, backers tried to reduce the majority needed to ratify stipulated in the Illinois Constitution by making the crazy claim that the Illinois Constitution provision for a 3/5ths vote could not apply to federal ratification and that the Illinois provision was only "precatory" or a wish that did not bind state lawmakers when they sat to ratify a federal amendment.

Liberal Harvard Professor Lawrence Tribe once flew to Springfield to make that case 38 years ago. The problem with that ridiculous Tribe fake argument was that the state lawmakers were only able to vote on any matter because they were created by the Illinois Constitution in the first place.

The United States Supreme Court has stated that ratifications must represent "as reasonably contemporaneous expression of the public will." How can anyone argue that almost four decades would be contemporaneous.

The bogus procedural vote this week was irrelevant and just plain silly. 


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories


  1. Exactly Mark…. what many people forget is constitutions are the PEOPLE’s document, that spells out the rules for state & federal govt. We the People created govt via constitutions, govt didn’t create itself. The very reason for the vigorous procedure contained within all 50 state constitutions and the US constitution for amending the constitutions, SCOTUS got it right… it “must represent an expression of the public will”.